Authors: Solène Tarride, Mélodie Boillet, Christopher Kermorvant

Affiliation: TEKLIA

Description: We use DAN for HTR on records, and then we apply SpaCy for NER.
Two SpaCy models are trained: one for the person, the other for the category.

method: TEKLIA DAN (HTR+NER)2023-02-07

Authors: Solène Tarride, Mélodie Boillet, Christopher Kermorvant

Affiliation: TEKLIA

Description: We train DAN for HTR and NER on records.
We use a unique tag combining the category and person information (ex: [name_wife]Maria).

method: TEKLIA Kaldi + Flair2021-02-22

Authors: Marie-Laurence Bonhomme, Christopher Kermorvant

Affiliation: Teklia

Description: We used existing libraries (Kaldi for the HTR, and a number of NER tools ; here we submit the results obtained with FLAIR) on the IEHHR 2017 task (basic track) to compare the results in terms of impact of the HTR on the NER results to those observed on other datasets.

Ranking Table

Description Paper Source Code
DateMethodBasic ScoreComplete ScoreNameSurnameLocationOccupationStateInput Type
2023-01-13TEKLIA DAN (HTR) + SpaCy (NER)97.13%97.11%97.88%96.97%96.56%97.43%96.99%REGISTER
2023-02-07TEKLIA DAN (HTR+NER)97.03%96.93%97.63%95.92%96.63%97.23%97.83%REGISTER
2021-02-22TEKLIA Kaldi + Flair96.96%0.00%97.70%95.18%96.26%97.53%98.22%LINE
2024-02-12LITIS DAN (HTR+NER)96.80%96.84%96.30%96.60%96.29%97.34%97.57%PAGE
2023-01-13TEKLIA PyLaia (HTR) + SpaCy (NER)96.58%96.58%97.36%96.34%95.82%96.16%97.12%REGISTER
2023-02-07TEKLIA DAN (Key-value HTR+NER)96.48%96.31%97.33%95.32%95.49%97.35%97.07%REGISTER
2021-01-21InstaDeep-CRNS96.25%95.54%96.58%94.60%95.81%95.92%98.19%REGISTER
2023-01-03GNN-Transformer96.22%96.24%97.38%95.47%95.44%96.23%96.63%REGISTER
2018-06-25Naver Labs95.46%95.03%97.01%92.73%95.03%96.43%96.41%LINE
2017-07-09CITlab ARGUS (with OOV)91.94%91.58%95.14%85.78%88.43%93.08%97.54%LINE
2017-07-10CITlab ARGUS (with OOV, net2)91.63%91.19%95.09%85.84%87.32%92.96%97.19%LINE
2018-10-27Joint HTR + NER no postprocessing90.59%89.40%89.94%84.07%90.71%92.10%96.59%LINE
2017-07-09CITlab ARGUS (without OOV)89.54%89.17%94.37%76.54%87.65%92.66%97.43%LINE
2017-07-01Baseline HMM80.28%63.11%81.06%60.15%78.90%90.23%93.79%LINE

Ranking Graphic

Ranking Graphic